Mission Church (the Basilica of Our Lady of Perpetual Help), on Tremont Street, in Mission Hill, is one of the most significant pieces of architecture in the City of Boston. It was/is the spiritual home of immigrants from Europe, South America, and all points.
I believe that buildings like Mission Church play a significant role in American History, irrespective of their religiosity. This impressive edifice defines much of Boston's late-19th and early-20th century development. It is important beyond any of our spiritual or religious beliefs.
Like most Catholic churches, it is struggling to stay afloat. We all have opinions about why this has happened, and we are all appalled by the crimes committed by clergy of the Catholic church.
Does that mean this building no longer matters?
This building was and is a safe haven for immigrants, a food pantry for the hungry, a warm place for the homeless, a destination for tourists who want to know more about Boston and America, and much more.
I think this building matters a lot, and that we should support it as a cultural landmark.
No, the government isn't going to bail it out, and shouldn't. And none of us should want it to become part of the national treasure chest of government-financed heritage sites.
Citizens have to save this building. We can pretend that only Catholics have to save an edifice like this; but, I think this building and others like it, transcend religiosity, and are worth saving.
Please consider a donation to the fund established by the Redemptorist Priests of Boston in support Mission Church by visiting their website or Facebook page.
Sometimes we face challenges that seem insurmountable. When we are in that situation, a feeling of dread and hopelessness can take over. Maybe you have never been there. I have been there.
I am a lucky (or blessed) man. I have been granted many reprieves from the depths of hopelessness. It's not ever really easy to overcome, but it can be done.
This Thanksgiving week I heard a news story that made my heart ache and filled me with gratitude.
In New York City, a new mother, unable to cope with being a single mom, with no resources, and another human being to care for, decided to take advantage of the City's safe haven law. The safe haven law allows for a parent (generally a mother) in distress to leave a newborn child under 30-days-old at specific locations, where we are all relatively certain the baby will receive care. Safe havens are hospitals, firehouses, churches, police stations, and the such. Many people have taken advantage of this legal method for escaping the personal hell in which they have found themselves.
This has prevented the horror stories of unwanted babies (or babies of women who are overwhelmed by her inability to care for her child) being "disposed of" in dumpsters and trash cans. In fact, the safe haven laws in the United States have almost completely eradicated that horror.
In the most recent story, a new mother entered a store in Queens and purchased a bunch of purple towels. She then made her way to the Holy Child Jesus Catholic Church. Once inside the church, she made her way to the newly-installed nativity scene with an empty creche that on Christmas morning will hold a statue of the baby Jesus. She placed the baby in the creche, wrapped in the purple towels, and left.
For whatever reasons, she could not handle being a mother, found a place where she knew her newborn baby would be safe (inside a church), and left him there.
She had made a series of decisions that we can all judge however we choose. In the context of the safe-haven law, however, she missed one important point. She was supposed to inform someone that the baby was in the church. She did not do this. Because of that failure, it became a criminal investigation.
The next day she returned to the church to make sure the baby had been found. She was subject to arrest for her failure to inform anyone of the baby's whereabouts. The Queens County District Attorney Richard Brown became involved in the investigation, and would decide how to handle the situation. He offers this:
The mother followed the spirit of New York’s ‘Safe Haven’ Law, which allows a parent to leave a child not older than 30 days with an appropriate person or in a suitable location where the parent promptly notifies an appropriate person of the child’s location. It appears that the mother, in this case, felt her newborn child would be found safely in the church and chose to place the baby in the manger because it was the warmest place in the church, and further she returned the following morning to make certain that the baby had been found. New York Times article
She was NOT arrested and faces no criminal charges. THAT, my friends, is a public official using his intelligence and compassion to reach a conclusion that is best for all involved. He could have made this a grandstanding opportunity to further his career, but he didn't. He made the decision that best serves the child, the mother, the church, and all of society. That is what good people do.
Brooklyn-Queens Diocese spokeswoman Rocio Fidalgo, speaking on behalf of the church, offered:
We can’t imagine the desperation she must have gone through, but placing the baby in the manger where Jesus is born ... she wanted him to be close to Christ. We may never meet her, but our prayers are with her. Daily News Article
Desperation. Let that word roll around in your mind and heart for a few seconds. That is the spirit of the safe-have law: help human beings survive a moment of desperation. We, as a society, acknowledge that there are situations that need to be handled with compassion, and this law has worked.
For that I am grateful.
In closing, I am happy and proud to say that there are good people in law enforcement, and we need more people like Queens D.A. Richard Brown in the law enforcement system.
The American military has done some incredible things.
It is important to remember that there were times when Americans were sent to fight wars and they had no choice but to comply. Some of these people became heroes they never intended to be, some have been scarred for life. They deserve our thanks and respect.
We are creating new veterans today; people who have taken up arms at the behest of their government, and no matter what you think of war or peace, today is the day to say thank-you to a veteran for risking everything.
Anthony Fera, the president of Houston’s MidStar Energy LP, exchanged angry words with a gay couple, called them faggots, left his vehicle in traffic, punched one unconscious.
The incident allegedly began when the victims yelled at the driver of a pickup truck that they said nearly hit them as it drove out of a parking lot. The Dallas Voice reported that the driver responded with antigay slurs, stepped out of the vehicle and allegedly knocked Andy Smith— who was walking with his husband Paul von Wupperfeld— unconscious as the dispute escalated. Smith was unconscious for less than a minute as a result, the media report said. See, Houston oil business president charged with assault on gay couple, from the Houston Business Journal
Pictures taken at the scene included the license plate number on the pickup driven by the man who attacked Smith, allowing police to trace the pickup to Anthony Fera, president of an Austin-based oil company. . . . Fera has been arrested several other times in Texas and Pennsylvania. See, North Texas man attacked in Austin, from the Dallas Voice
So, this guy is a violent repeat offender, but his bail was only $5,000. When will a sociopath like this be locked-up to protect America? Why is he free on bail? What happens when he hits another person?
[CORRECTION 6/19/2105 14:04: It is the victim, Andy Smith, who is the executive director of the Texas Instruments Foundation.]
I start with the disclaimer that I am a Christian, a Catholic. I like the teachings of Jesus Christ and try to integrate those notions into my day-to-day life (with varying degrees of success and failure) so my view may be skewed, but I ask your indulgence.
If a "christian conservative" is a person who takes the Bible literally (which is what they seem to constantly claim), then they believe that everything on Earth is created by God. Given that line of thinking, the flowers that a Christian (or a "christian conservative") florist sells are available for sale only through God's good graces.
So, God has created flowers for all people (we are all God's children, if I am not mistaken). God has created flowers for funerals and weddings and gifts and decoration and also to play a role in the food chain. Flowers are multi-purpose and for Christians (and "christian conservatives") they must represent further proof of God's awesome plan and creation.
How then, can a "christian conservative" decide who gets to use God's creation and who doesn't? If "christian conservatives" already believe that flowers are the provenance (as everything is) of God, then it is their duty as Christians to be certain that all people share in God's bounty. In America, of course, that means the consumer has the ability to pay for the service; but, let's put that aside for the time being.
So, every Christian florist (and "christian conservative" florist, too), has a duty to provide flowers to every couple who wants them at their wedding. Christian (and "christian conservative") florists are stewards of God's bounty, after all, and as stewards it is their responsibility to ENSURE that all people have flowers at their weddings.
So, either flowers are part of God's gift to us and florists are stewards of that gift with the simple responsibility of distributing to all of God's children who want (and can afford) them. OR, flowers are the domain of "christian conservatives," God has no role in the bounty, and "christian conservatives" assume the power to decide who gets flowers and who doesn't.
So, "christian conservatives": which way is it? Are flowers part of God's bounty and awesome creation or not. Are florists stewards of God's bounty, or are florists God's police?
It seems to me you can't have it both ways.
Florists who refuse to sell flowers to same-sex couples for a wedding are bad people, wholly un-American, completely un-Christ-like, and an embarrassment to God and country.
Wow, "christian conservative" florists aren't Christians, at all!
As a closing thought, chances are that the flowers done by florists who don't like same-sex marriage are probably not very nice floral arrangements. But, that's another thread.
